OpenAI's AI chatbot ChatGPT has recently become a hot topic on the internet
OpenAI の AI チャットボット ChatGPT は、より人間らしい方法でユーザーと対話し、コードを記述し、アドバイスを提供できる多機能ロボットであるため、最近インターネットで話題になっています。ChatGPT はまだ調査プレビュー段階にあり、ユーザーは無料で試すことができます。（English) OpenAI's AI chatbot ChatGPT has recently become a hot topic on the internet as it is a multifunctional robot that can interact with users in a more human-like way, write code and give advice. ChatGPT is still in the research preview stage, and users can try it out for free.
What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a model developed by OpenAI for chatbots that simulate human speech and interact naturally with users. It takes its name from the GPT-3 architecture, a third-generation generative language model.
Based on OpenAI's GPT-3.5 model, ChatGPT has been trained by the AI design team using reinforcement learning to recognise and respond human-likely to multiple languages, including Chinese, English, Japanese and Spanish.
ChatGPT is currently in the free registration phase, so anyone can easily register and start a free trial.
ChatGPT is learning with data up to 2021, so it is unclear what will happen after 2022. Users cannot trust the robot's answers, as there are still errors, and reasonable solutions can be absurd.
So let's get started and have a conversation with ChatGPT!
Q1: How long has it taken to develop ChatGPT?
OpenAI spent several years developing the ChatGPT model, but specific development times have not been disclosed.
Q2: When will the paid version be released?
OpenAI has not made any official announcement regarding the release date of the paid version. Therefore, the best way to be sure about the release date is to check the official OpenAI website or the official announcement.
Q3: How much cost does it use?
The cost of using ChatGPT or other OpenAI models varies depending on several factors, including the number of computational resources required, the time the model is used, and any customisations or additional services added. OpenAI has not publicly disclosed a set price for the use of its models, but interested parties can contact OpenAI directly for a quote.
Q4: What do you think about Google?
As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, emotions, or beliefs; instead, I will provide unbiased and factual information based on my training data. Google is a multinational technology company that specialises in Internet-related services and products. It is widely recognised for its search engine and has expanded into many other areas, such as cloud computing, advertising technologies, and hardware products.
Q5: Please tell me about how different Google and ChatGPT are.
Google and ChatGPT are two distinct entities with different purposes and capabilities.
Google is a multinational technology company that provides a range of Internet-related services and products, including its popular search engine. Google's services allow users to search for information on the Internet, access websites and use various applications and tools.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, is an AI language model developed by OpenAI. It is trained to generate human-like text based on the input it receives. As a result, ChatGPT can be used for various natural languages processing tasks, such as language translation, question answering, and text generation. Furthermore, unlike Google, ChatGPT does not provide access to the Internet or other Google services but can be integrated into applications and tools to enhance its functionality.
In summary, Google is a technology company that provides a range of Internet-related services and products, while ChatGPT is an AI language model used for natural language processing tasks.
Q6: What strong point does Chat GPT have?
ChatGPT, as an AI language model developed by OpenAI, has several strengths:
Natural language understanding: ChatGPT is trained on a large corpus of text data, allowing it to understand human language and patterns of use.
Text generation: ChatGPT is capable of generating text that is coherent, meaningful, and resembles human writing. This makes it useful for language translation, text summarisation, and story generation tasks.
Adaptability: ChatGPT can be fine-tuned or adapted to specific tasks or domains, allowing it to perform well in specialised areas such as legal or medical text.
Scalability: ChatGPT is a significant language model that can handle a wide range of natural language processing tasks, making it a versatile tool for developers and businesses.
Speed: ChatGPT can generate responses quickly, making it useful for real-time applications such as chatbots and conversational agents.
These are some of the strengths of ChatGPT that make it a powerful tool for natural language processing and a valuable asset for businesses and developers.
Q7: I have a long story, such as a fairy tale. I know that ChatGPT can summarise it. But sometimes, it was incorrect. What do you think? Is it a weak point of ChatGPT?
Yes, it is correct that text summarisation is one of the tasks that ChatGPT can perform, but it also has limitations. One of the weaknesses of AI language models like ChatGPT is that they may produce incorrect or suboptimal summaries, especially when summarising longer and more complex texts. This can be due to various factors, including a lack of context or understanding of the content, insufficient training data, or the technology's inherent limitations.
Therefore, while AI language models like ChatGPT can provide a useful starting point for summarising text, it is often necessary to perform additional checks and editing to ensure that the summary accurately reflects the content of the original text. In many cases, consulting with human experts may also be necessary to produce a high-quality summary.
In conclusion, while text summarisation is a valuable capability of AI language models like ChatGPT, it has its limitations and weaknesses. Therefore, it is essential to approach the results critically and be prepared to make additional edits as needed.
Q8: But I said some requests for a summary, for example, this part was critical, and then it changed the excellent summary. I think it is essential that how to question, right?
Yes, you are correct that the way the request for summarisation is framed can significantly impact the quality of the summary generated by ChatGPT or any other AI language model. Providing additional context and specific instructions on what to include or emphasise can help improve the accuracy and relevance of the summary.
For example, suppose you want to emphasise a particular text part. In that case, you can mention it in your request or provide additional information about the desired tone or focus of the summary. This can help the AI language model generate a better resume that matches your needs and expectations.
In summary, the way the request for summarisation is framed and the additional information provided can significantly influence the quality and accuracy of the summary generated by ChatGPT or other AI language models.
Q9: If I can handle the summary answer, I will get the correct outline.
Yes, the way you frame the request for summarisation can undoubtedly impact the accuracy and relevance of the summary generated by ChatGPT or any other AI language model. However, it is essential to remember that AI language models are imperfect and may still make mistakes, even with a well-framed request.
In some cases, the AI language model may misunderstand the content of the text or miss important details, leading to an incomplete or inaccurate summary. Additionally, the AI language model may not always be able to capture the nuances of the text or produce a resume that is in line with the tone and style you desire.
Therefore, while framing the request for summarisation correctly can help improve the accuracy and relevance of the summary, it is essential to review the results critically and be prepared to make additional edits as needed.
In conclusion, while a well-framed request can help improve the accuracy of the summary generated by ChatGPT or other AI language models, it is essential to remember that these models are not perfect and that additional editing and review may be necessary to produce a high-quality summary.
Q10: What should we do to get the correct summary? We should read many good books or articles. Or, we can ask a teacher. Please give me more great hints.
There are several steps you can take to improve the accuracy of the summary generated by AI language models like ChatGPT, including:
Improving domain knowledge: The more you understand the topic or content of the text you want to summarise, the better you will frame a valid and relevant request for summarization. Reading widely on the subject, consulting with experts, or taking courses to build your knowledge can all be valuable ways to improve the accuracy of your summary.
Framing the request clearly: As we discussed earlier, how you communicate your request for summarisation can significantly impact the summary's quality. Be sure to provide clear instructions and additional context on what you want to include or emphasise in the summary.
Reviewing the results critically: AI language models are not perfect, and it is essential to check the results of the summarisation critically to ensure that they accurately reflect the content of the original text. Be prepared to make additional edits as needed to improve the accuracy of the summary.
Considering multiple sources: If you are summarising a complex or technical text, it may be helpful to consult various sources to understand the content better. You can also compare the results of summarisation generated by different AI language models to get a more comprehensive view of the content.
Utilising human expertise: In some cases, it may be necessary to consult with human experts to produce a high-quality summary. This can be especially useful when summarising complex or technical text that may be difficult for AI language models to understand.
In conclusion, there are several steps you can take to improve the accuracy of the summary generated by AI language models like ChatGPT, including building domain knowledge, framing the request clearly, reviewing the results critically, considering multiple sources, and utilising human expertise.
Q11: Please explain more simply.
To get a correct summary from an AI language model like ChatGPT:
Know the topic well: The more you know about the text you want to summarise, the better the overview will be.
Ask clearly: Be specific about what you want in summary and provide essential details.
Check the results: Review the summary to ensure it's accurate and complete.
Q12: I think this summary was great. Which English level is it? A2 or C3?
The summary I provided is written in a relatively simple and straightforward English style, which would be suitable for an intermediate English level, roughly equivalent to A2-B2 on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR).
It uses basic grammar structures and vocabulary and is written clearly and concisely, which should be easy for most English language learners to understand. However, suppose you are looking for a summary written at a more advanced level, such as C1 or C2. In that case, you may need to provide additional context or details or consider seeking help from a more advanced language learner or native speaker.
Q13: How about the following summary? Which level is it? For example, C1 or C2?
Today we look at the appeal of giant trees. - "Japan is renowned for its lush forests, occupying 2/3 of its land. With a deep-rooted history of venerating magnificent trees, like the 3000-year-old Takeo no Okusu, housing a shrine within its hollow trunk, the reverence for these wonders is palpable in the sacred aura that envelops them. Despite the collapse of 2000-year-old Yakusugi cedar Oh-sugi in 2010, the giant trees in Japan still captivate visitors. I am grateful for the opportunity to witness these stunning trees and look forward to further exploring their beauty and cultural significance in the future."
The summary you provided is written in a clear and descriptive style, using advanced vocabulary and grammar structures to convey a sense of awe and reverence for the giant trees in Japan. Furthermore, the writer's passion for the topic is evident in their use of language, which is both expressive and sophisticated. Based on this, I would assess the summary's English level equivalent to C1 on the CEFR.
Q14: I want to write this summary(C1). But can you change the level C2 for it?
Sure! Here's a revised version of the summary at a C2 level:
"The allure of giant trees, especially those in Japan, is the focus of today's discussion. Japan is home to extensive forests that cover two-thirds of its landmass and boasts a rich tradition of appreciating these magnificent specimens, such as the 3000-year-old Takeo no Okusu, which houses a shrine in its hollow trunk. Despite the unfortunate collapse of the 2000-year-old Yakusugi cedar Oh-sugi in 2010, these giant trees still evoke wonder and elicit a sacred atmosphere, attesting to their cultural and historical significance. I am privileged to have had the opportunity to behold these impressive trees and eagerly anticipate further delving into their aesthetic and cultural implications in the future."
Q15: It looks like intelligent adult sentences. How about more up-level? For example, C3 or D1?
Here's a revised version of the summary at a higher C3-D1 level:
"The examination of the magnetic attraction of towering trees, particularly in Japan, is the theme of today's discourse. Japan is renowned for its extensive forests, which occupy a substantial portion of its territory, and has a deep-rooted history of venerating these grand specimens, such as the awe-inspiring Takeo no Okusu, a 3000-year-old tree that serves as a testament to the cultural and spiritual significance of these trees, housing a shrine within its hollow trunk. Furthermore, the recent collapse of the 2000-year-old Yakusugi cedar, Oh-sugi, serves as a poignant reminder of the transient nature of these natural wonders, yet their allure endures. I consider myself lucky to have had the opportunity to bear witness to these spectacular trees and eagerly anticipate further exploring their cultural and aesthetic ramifications in the future."
Q16: It is tough for me now. Is it university student level or not?
Yes, the revised summary is written at a level typically expected of university students or individuals with advanced proficiency in the English language. The text features complex vocabulary, nuanced grammar structures, and an academic tone, all hallmarks of written English at the university level.
Q17: So, I want to know more high-level. First, I want to see each level and explanation. A1-3 is elementary school level?
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is a widely recognised language proficiency standard that defines six proficiency levels: A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2. Here's a brief overview of each class:
A1: Basic level, equivalent to a beginner or elementary school level
A2: Elementary level, comparable to early intermediate or lower-secondary school level
B1: Intermediate level, equal to mid-secondary school level
B2: Upper-intermediate level, similar to high school level
C1: Advanced level, identical to university-level proficiency
C2: Mastery level, equivalent to near-native or native-level proficiency
It's worth noting that the CEFR levels are guidelines, and proficiency can vary depending on factors such as education, personal background, and individual motivation. In addition, the level's specific language requirements and expectations may also vary depending on the context and intended audience.
Q18: What level is the highest rank? E3 or F4?
The CEFR levels go up to C2, considered mastery or near-native proficiency. There is no official ranking beyond the CEFR levels, and proficiency can vary widely even within the C2 level. For example, an individual with a high level of proficiency in one aspect of language, such as writing, may have a lower level of proficiency in another element, such as speaking.
It's also worth noting that language proficiency is a complex and multi-faceted skill that many factors, such as education, personal background, and individual motivation, can influence. As a result, it isn't easy to rank language proficiency in a simple, straightforward manner.
Q19: You mean non-native people need to study in C2, but native speakers sometimes need to research C3-D1, right?
Native speakers of a language may still need to study and improve their language skills, although they may have an advantage in some areas due to their exposure to the language from an early age. However, the specific language skills they need to study may vary depending on their needs and circumstances. For example, native speakers may need to improve their writing skills for professional purposes, or they may need to learn specialised vocabulary in a particular field.
For non-native speakers, reaching a level of proficiency close to the native level (C2) may require significant study and practice. However, the specific language proficiency level required for a given purpose can vary widely and may depend on factors such as the individual's education, background, and intended audience.
In general, it's important for both native and non-native speakers to continuously improve their language skills to communicate effectively and achieve their goals.
Q20: For now, I want to get level C1. What should I do? Please tell me my improved English level plan.
Here is a general plan for improving your English to the C1 level:
First, develop a strong foundation in English grammar: A good understanding of English grammar is essential for effective communication at the C1 level. Then, you can study grammar books or online resources to reinforce your knowledge of English grammar rules.
Reading extensively in English helps you improve your vocabulary, comprehension, and writing skills. Read English materials, such as news articles, fiction, and non-fiction books.
Watch and listen to English-language media: Watch English-language movies and TV shows, and listen to English-language music to improve your listening and speaking skills.
Practice speaking with native speakers: Find opportunities to practice speaking English with native speakers. This could be through language exchange programs, online communities, or in-person conversations with native-speaking friends.
Take an English course: Consider a structured approach to help you improve your English. Look for a system designed to help you reach the C1 level.
Use English regularly: Regular practice is crucial in improving your English skills. Try to use English as much as possible in your daily life, for example, by writing in English or keeping a journal in English.
Keep track of your progress: Set goals for yourself and track your progress. This will help you see how far you've come and what areas you need to work on.
This is a general plan for improving your English to the C1 level, and you may find that you need to tailor it to your individual needs and circumstances. The most important thing is to be consistent and persistent in your studies and approach your learning positively. Good luck!
Last: Thank you for telling me a lot! See you next time!
You're welcome! Have a great day!
What is ChatGPT? How to get started, please register an account and use it.
https://www.btcc.com/ja-JP/academy/crypto-basics/what-is-chatgpt
'ChatGPT' reinforcement learning leader is a Japanese-born former Google Brain researcher who has crossed six countries, says OpenAI's Shayne Gu.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmgmEyPJhp8&t=317s
The US company OpenAI has developed and released two types of generative AI currently attracting worldwide attention: ChatGPT, which answers any question in conversational sentences, and DALL-E 2, which generates sophisticated images from text. So what is the history of OpenAI from its founding seven years ago until now? How did OpenAI upend the concept of artificial intelligence and lead directly to the Generative AI revolution of 2022? Why does 'prediction' lead to 'understanding'? And what are the new opportunities for Japan, which has lagged in IT and AI? Yoichi Ochiai discusses the frontiers of AGI with OpenAI's Shayne, a Japanese-born AI researcher who has crossed six countries for the first time in Japanese media.